Search for: "Justice v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 31,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
United States oral argument reminded me of how little the Roberts Court has actually cared about rule of law values and legal transparency during its 18-year run. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
And I illustrate this logic at work in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
United States, which concerned whether presidents have criminal "immunity" for their official acts while in office. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Nearly thirty years ago Justice Scalia’s Tanner lectures identified Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Far more interesting has been the effects within the domains of Latin American politics, especially among the CELAC states (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) including Cuba--the competitor organization to the OAS (Organization of American States) including the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:45 am by Brian Leiter
Apt commentary from Cornell law professor Michael Dorf; from the opening paragraph: The positions staked out by the Court's most conservative Justices were themselves Trumpian, not so much in their audacity or mendacity but in their prolixity. [read post]