Search for: "Little v. United States of America et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Fossil, Inc. et al (Docket Report) CAFC: Liability for offers to sell clarified: Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm
For more on this topic, read the comments to this Tax Prof Blog post (which also notes that municipal bond interest is not subject to the 3.8% Medicare tax). 2014: Impose annual fee on health insurance providers; based upon firm’s market share starting in 2013 [Watch out, Humana, United Health, et al., in case you didn't get the message the year before, when your executives' salaries got de-facto capped...] [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Canada now enjoys a greater degree of economic freedom than the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
V: We Are Not Little Children, And We Know What We Want. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
I also want to wish you, and all thefriends of the people ofthe United States of America, a happy Fourth of July. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Les Québécoises et les Québécois forment une nation. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Two unit managers report to the DON. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
But then again, Fully automated deletion or suspension of content can be particularly effective and should be applied where the circumstances leave little doubt about the illegality of the material, e.g. in cases of material whose removal is notified by law enforcement authorities[.] [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
