Search for: "M-I L.L.C." Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
The complaint asserted the following:  In 1996, petitioner acquired a “global master license” (GML) to use the Von Dutch label, and he founded a company, Von Dutch Originals, L.L.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:25 am by David Post
Im not enough of a Court-watcher to know whether the Court would, if it grants cert, do the sensible thing and overrule (or at least narrow into non-existence) the Calder doctrine – the prospect of the Court hearing the case and re-affirming (or even, heaven forbid, strengthening) the doctrine does, I admit, make me a little nervous (though maybe someone who knows the predilections of our Justices better than I do can reassure me on that score). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This strikes me as a really interesting result, but Im not sure what to say about it. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:30 am by Tim Zinnecker
  See, e.g., Agriliance, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by Lori Paul
Schibell, Mennie and Kentos, L.L.C., and Richard N. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am by Don Cruse
I am attending today’s arguments in my capacity as counsel not as a blogger (Im on the briefs in one case), and tomorrow morning I have a conflicting oral argument in a different court. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
According to EPA, 122 Chestnut, L.L.C., failed to provide tenants with lead hazard information pamphlets; failed to include lead warning statements in leases; failed to include a disclosure statement regarding lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in leases; and failed to include lists of records or reports pertaining to lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in leases. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm by David Oscar Markus
Bath Junkie, Inc., 528 F.3d 556 (8th Cir. 2008).Im sure there are other nuggets of knowledge I’ve missed, but this is most of it. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Mill-Rose Company (Docket Report) District Court Arizona: In trial of declaratory relief case, defendant to proceed first and neither party may refer to itself as ‘plaintiff’: DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:20 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Enterprise Publishing Co., L.L.C., decided by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts on January 7, 2010--but I'm beginning to think I was wrong. [read post]