Search for: "Mark A. Strauss" Results 141 - 160 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 10:13 am by Katherine Pompilio
The select committee will hear testimony from Nancy Sutley, senior assistant general manager of external and regulatory affairs at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Karen Waylan, chief executive officer of GridWise Alliance; Katherine Hamilton, chair of 38 North Solutions and of the Global Future Council on Clean Electrification at the World Economic Forum; and Mark Mills, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:33 am by Zoe Tillman
Cornèr Bank attorney Mark MacDougall of Washington’s Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld did not immediately return a request for comment. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
The May/June issue of World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR) from Newton Media leads with an interview with Levi Strauss chief IP counsel Tom Onda on that company's IP management. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
I’ll be joining an all-star line up of speakers including Lorelle VanFossen, Liz Strauss, Cali Lewis, Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins, Dave Moyer (whom is also a fellow host with me on Aimless Agenda), DB Ferguson, Randy Hoyt and, of course, the head of Automattic, Matt Mullenweg as well as many, many others. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:34 pm
Lindquist & Vennum litigation partners Edward Glennon and Mark Jacobson are serving as local counsel. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 3:02 am
Fuchsberg Law Center, Central Islip, New YorkSecretary: Mark E. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
Goldstein, an appellate lawyer with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in Washington. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
 The MARQUES Class 99 design law blog offers a neat analysis by Henning Hartwig of some recent German litigation between Levi Strauss and German company New Yorker under the even neater title "Black eye for selling blue jeans". [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:11 am by Anushka Limaye
The White House released the 2018 National Strategy for Counterterrorism on Oct. 4, marking the first time such strategy has been released since 2011, and Mikhaila Fogel shared the text of the document. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm by Tia Sewell
Emma Broches and Julia Solomon-Strauss analyzed the federal and state prosecutions of white supremacists and far-right individuals or groups over the past six months. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 9:31 am by Elliot Setzer
Mark Lagon and Rachel Sadoff argued that China has led the aid response to the coronavirus crisis in Africa—and that the United States should step up. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:20 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are today's leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:PayPal sues Google over trade secrets - http://goo.gl/dN4xrPrisoners would be forced to work under Ontario Conservative leader's proposal - CTV.ca - http://goo.gl/1ZUrvHudak proposes modern-day chain gangs - http://goo.gl/oP84M In Commencement Speech, Law Prof Tells Grads Coveting Big-Money Jobs to ‘Get over It’ - http://goo.gl/OT4w5Edwards's Lawyers in Plea Talks (Evan Perez/Wall Street Journal)… [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:56 pm
This case was referred to the ECJ for further ruling, it came up for consideration with the joined cases brought by Levi Strauss against Tesco and Costco . [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
 These performances marked the U.S. premiere, the piece having also had some outings in various European music centers. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
No. 22-148 (Aug. 5, 2022). [3] Id. [4] The Rogers test states that expressive works may use another’s trademark unless (i) the mark has no artistic relevance to the underlying work; or (ii) use of the mark is explicitly misleading. [read post]