Search for: "Mark V. Hill" Results 141 - 160 of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2019, 1:05 am
The perception of the marks by the average consumer of the goods or services in question plays a decisive role in the global assessment and that consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole without engaging in details (OHIM v Shaker, C-334/05).Having said that, with regard to the visual similarities of the signs, the GC considered that these are similar to the extent that they share a figurative element depicting an anthropomorphic animal with a round head and a… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
Beverly Hills is famous for many things, including the activities of a vacationing policeman and - to a slightly lesser extent - its Polo team. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
Some notable quotables from the discussion: *"The courts in the era of Thurgood Marshall and Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:58 am
Sweely Holdings, LLC, Opposition No. 91168790 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of ACORN HILL ESTATE, ACORN HILL VINEYARDS, and ACORN HILL WINERY for wine and potable spirits, in view of the registered mark ACORN for wine.]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
March 31, 2009 marks the beginning date for Congressional hearings for legislation designed to protect consumers. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:07 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 191 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in September 2022 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number Work Mark 6861426 GLYPHIC BLIND BAG 6859519 POSITIONING PATIENTS FOR SUCCESS 6861269 EMBER 6859186 MARACAY BROWN 6859185 LOTON HILL 6859184 CALACATTA LAZA NIGHT 6861389 NORTHEAST INDIANA TALENT ATTRACTION 6861381 BROMOS 6858356 LOST CABIN ART & DECOR 6858003 CALACATTA… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Stuart Buck
In so doing, the state apparently realized the futility of claiming that its expansive buffer zone law was supported by Hill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Empirical SCOTUS] * Will Baude breaks down the Court's intriguing debate over stare decisis in South Dakota v. [read post]