Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm
The Supreme Court also dropped a footnote, however, stating that:"the Court has not definitively decided whether the evidentiary framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 5:01 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 191 F.3d 948 (8th Cir. 1999), employees claimed that a workforce reduction, while not disproportionately affecting employees age 40 and older, disproportionately affected employees age 55 and older. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
Paul Ryan 01/27/2010 Excerpts From Governor Bob McDonnell's Republican Address to the Nation (PDF 15.3 KB)Released by the Office of Gov. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
The Court found that the trial judge wrongly applied the second and third prongs of the McDonnell Douglas frame work when it granted a motion for summary judgment for the County. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 7:50 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 626, 641-642, 653-655 [22-year old plaintiff was hit in the head and back with a 630-pound pipe, rendering him triplegic, with loss of all movement, sexual function, bladder and bowel control, and in constant pain, but with normal life expectancy; jury awards total economic and non-economic damages of $4,235,996, which the reviewing court upholds]; Niles v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:50 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 626, 641-642, 653-655 [22-year old plaintiff was hit in the head and back with a 630-pound pipe, rendering him triplegic, with loss of all movement, sexual function, bladder and bowel control, and in constant pain, but with normal life expectancy; jury awards total economic and non-economic damages of $4,235,996, which the reviewing court upholds]; Niles v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:42 pm
. --- Associated Press, October 17, 2009 The Wall Street Journal reports that the Federal Aviation Administration may be expanding its investigation into suspected structural problems found in American Airlines’ McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series jets. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
General Dynamics Corp., (1st Cir. 1998) 144 F3d 151, 161 (under the McDonnell Douglas framework the prima facie burden is quite easy to meet). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
Instead, “[t]he qualifications that are most appropriately considered at step one [of McDonnell Douglas] are those to which objective criteria can be applied . . . . [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:33 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Thus, courts in recent years have simply taken the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
., McDonnell Douglas XIII; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
., McDonnell Douglas XIII; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Another chapter in the A-12 story has just been published by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, this McDonnell Douglas Corp. and General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:31 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 157, 171 [209 Cal.Rptr. 427], where the trial judge concluded damages were excessive based on juror declarations stating that the plaintiff's counsel would receive 33% of what we awarded to Mrs. [read post]
19 May 2009, 1:29 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 533 F.3d 381 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:18 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:50 pm
McDonnell Douglas, White v. [read post]
