Search for: "Merck & Company, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:29 am
As a personal injury lawyer in Miami who sues diabetes drug companies, without question the practice of law has become more complex, difficult, and expensive since I started more than 20 years ago. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
A.D. 2011).The issue of whether a company complied or did not comply with FDA requirements is relevant to many aspects of the products liability lawsuit. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
American Medical Systems, Inc., 958 F. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:45 am
Sheridan) ruled against the company on the issue of patent infringement in its suit against Apotex Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
Puneet Mehra, Sumeet Mehra and Amit Mehra, Amit Mehra through his company Adai Mehra Production Pvt. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:22 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., No. 1:2008-cv-04119 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 5, 2013). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:22 am
Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
I have no connection to Merck & Co., nor would I have any reason to believe that someone had previously searched for me in connection with Merck. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
I have no connection to Merck & Co., nor would I have any reason to believe that someone had previously searched for me in connection with Merck. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:01 am
No other company had this set in 1991, and only Merck had much of it by mid–1993. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:00 am
” [3] When the terminal disclaimer was filed on July 2, 2010, the application that issued as the ‘176 patent and the ‘789 patent were also owned by Email Link and Online News Link. [4] Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
The NuvaRing birth control product was initially approved by the FDA in October 2001, when Organon USA Inc. was the responsible drug company. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
According to the opinion, the company and its licensees have spent $100 million marketing Metafolin. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 11:00 am
As background, the NuvaRing birth control product was initially approved by the FDA in October 2001, when Organon USA Inc. was the responsible drug company. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., No. 12-245, and Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:38 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 949 A.2d 223, 256 (N.J. [read post]
