Search for: "Michael Donald" Results 141 - 160 of 4,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 3:58 am by Will Baude
My article with Michael Stokes Paulsen about the continuing legal force and broad substantive sweep of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment has now been published in final form in the Penn Law Review. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by Adam Klasfeld
Now that a judgment has been signed forcing him to pay roughly $450 million in a civil fraud judgment, former President Donald Trump may be in a hurry to blunt the impact of the ruling on appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Willis testified during an extraordinary hearing that could result in her office being removed from the state’s case against Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
The justices did not act on former President Donald Trump’s request to block the decision by a federal appeals court denying his claim of immunity from criminal charges that he conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am by Josh Blackman
Professor Will Baude and Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, to their credit, made a point along the same lines. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
The court heard the testimony of a D&O insurance underwriter from HCC, Michael Holl, and a surety underwriter from Zurich, Claudia Markarian. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 10:00 am by Gene Takagi
(Somini Sengupta and Monika Pronczuk, NY Times) Opinion: A Slap Shot Against Climate Denial (Michael E. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Witness Against Gaetz Is Cooperating with House Ethics Investigation DNyuz – Robert Draper and Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 2/9/2024 A lawyer for the chief witness against U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Amy Howe
” But in a filing signed by Michael Dreeben, a former deputy U.S. solicitor general who has argued more than 100 cases at the Supreme Court, Smith countered that Trump is simply seeking to delay the trial in his case. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:24 am by Adam Klasfeld
The criminal case against former President Donald Trump for allegedly falsifying business records to smother a scandal during the 2016 presidential election remains on course for a March trial, as a Manhattan judge on Thursday refused to dismiss his 34-count felony indictment. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:05 am by jonathanturley
There is a disturbing report published on Michael Shellenberger’s Public Substack detailing how the U.S. intelligence community called upon foreign governments to target associates of Donald Trump before the 2016 election. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:24 am by Joshua Matz
By virtue of this history and precedent, calls to impeach Mayorkas have been widely denounced among experts, including such conservatives as Michael Chertoff, Ross Garber, and Jonathan Turley. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 8:01 am by Just Security
During his tenure as a Courthouse News reporter, he covered then-President Donald Trump’s impeachment trials, Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking case, Michael Cohen, and Chelsea Manning’s Wikileaks case, among many others. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:02 am by Rick Hasen
AP: In pushing Michael Whatley as the next leader of the Republican National Committee, Donald Trump zeroed in on the North Carolina GOP chairman’s dedication to “election integrity,” baselessly suggesting he would ensure the 2024 race “can’t be stolen. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, February 15th, Justice Juan Merchan will consider Donald Trump’s request to drop the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office case against him. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:16 am by Beatrice Yahia
Michael Crowley reports for the New York Times. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Unfortunately, they did so in a way that strongly suggests that the Court will reverse the Colorado Supreme Court and allow former President Trump to continue to menace American democracy.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]