Search for: "Michael Dreeben" Results 141 - 160 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
The Justices pushed Michael Dreeben (arguing for the United States) on the consequences of his argument: If the Government was right, they noted, then the government can install a GPS device on all the Justices’ cars and watch them, too, along with everybody else. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
(At oral argument, Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben contended that the government didn’t dispute the funds were, in fact, tainted because it decided not to, not because the government, in fact, agreed that they were untainted. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:42 pm by Amy Howe
Lawyer Michael Dreeben argued on behalf of the city of Austin, whose sign ordinance permits signs that advertise “on premises” businesses or activities – that is, businesses or activities with a connection to the site where the sign is located, but bars new “off premises” signs, which lack such a connection. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:58 am by Adam Feldman
Michael Dreeben and Donald Verrilli both argued cases with QPs that raised questions under six amendments altogether. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
” He also noted Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s addition of Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben to Mueller’s team as “the worst thing that happened to Donald Trump this week. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
The government’s argument The government signaled the importance of the case (as well as, perhaps, the paucity of available oral arguments for lawyers in the Solicitor General’s office) by sending longtime Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben to argue. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:20 am
" The statement included a quotation from Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben's argument in the Court that "we cannot have all our own personal guidelines systems. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:47 pm by Jillian Beck
Dreeben “Confidentiality,” by David Jones “Boxes,” by Lane D. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm by Mike Scarcella
More recently, McLeese temporarily served as the acting deputy solicitor general in the office, filling in for Michael Dreeben while he teaches at Duke University Law School. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
Michael Dreeben spoke next, in favor of the US. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
It will be interesting to see which cases are assigned to the most senior advocates (Kagan, Edwin Kneedler, Neal Katyal) and which arguments are given to lower-ranking members (Michael Dreeben, Malcolm Stewart, Lisa Blatt, Matthew Roberts, William Jay, Toby Heytens, Eric Miller, Deanne Maynard) in order to decrease the burden on each individual advocate. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
He feared that a President who could face criminal charges would just try to pardon himself--and while the Court hasn't ever adjudicated whether that's permissible, it might uphold such an action, so apparently that's definitely a good reason to recognize immunity and thus give a President everything he might otherwise obtain via a self-pardon, which, remember, Justice Gorsuch was implying is a bad thing.When attorney Michael Dreeben, arguing on behalf of the special… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
  According to Orin Kerr: It was very engaging argument with two excellent advocates, Pam Karlan for Herring and Michael Dreeben for the United States, and the Justices were in top form. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the new letter to the Court, Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:54 pm by Tom Goldstein
  The answer to that question was provided by Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben, who argued that the link was provided by evidence of the chain of custody of the DNA sample. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Jimmy Hoover reports for Law360 (subscription required) that “Supreme Court veteran Michael Dreeben’s next move after 30 years at the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm by James Romoser
Michael Dreeben, arguing for Taylor, provided a hypothetical example to show why the lower court was right. [read post]