Search for: "Neil S. Siegel" Results 141 - 160 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am by SHG
“I can say that my two newest colleagues are very decent and very smart individuals,” she said Wednesday at an event in Washington, D.C., hosted by Duke Law as she answered questions from Neil Siegel, a law professor and one of her former law clerks. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel reacts to the description of the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate in Joan Biskupic’s recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm by David Lat
As Justice Scalia explained during an appearance at Duke Law School:[Professor Neil] Siegel, a constitutional law scholar and former Supreme Court clerk, asked Scalia to expound on his statement that he was “an originalist, not a nut. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
March 4, 12:30-2 PM, Duke Law School, Rm. 3037, Durham, NC:  "How Federalism Protects Sanctuary Cities," panel on "Federalism and Sanctuary Cities" (with Duke law professors Ernie Young and Neil Siegel). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
At Verdict, Neil Buchanan argues that the majority was right to hold that the mandate falls under Congress’s taxing power. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Bagenstos
 Neil Siegel and others have offered arguments for upholding the mandate based on constitutional structure. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:25 pm
 As Neil Siegel and I explained in our Anti-Injunction Act article, that particular juxtaposition is difficult to reconcile with the Court's precedents in this area; yet the government advanced the argument anyway. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
Neil Siegel, in his 2005 critique of Sunstein's work on minimalism - A Theory in Search of a Court, and itself: Judicial Minimalism at the Supreme Court Bar, available online here - has written that "pre-empirically, it appears more likely that whatever costs the Court saves itself by taking a minimalist path will be outweighed by the costs incurred by litigants, lower courts, and, political bodies". [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
 At Balkinization, Neil Siegel implores the justices not to “’just look away’” from the real motivations behind the decision. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel            The constitutional text looms large in the recess appointments case, NLRB v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:56 am by Samuel Bray
  The equality arguments summarized by Professor Reva Siegel and Professor Neil Siegel (and here by just RS) recognize a "bona fide interest in protecting potential life. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Neil Siegel In a new article, I argue that Court-packing—that is, changing the size of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm by Randy Barnett
Thus the ACA’s exaction for non-insurance has a penalty’s expression and a tax’s materiality. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Also at this blog, Suzanne Goldberg and Neil Siegel weighed in on the denials. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
His opinion bore a remarkable similarity to an academic paper posted to SSRN by Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel, “Not the Power to Destroy: An Effects Theory of the Tax Power,” which had been downloaded 162 times at the time of the decision. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]