Search for: "Paramount Contracting Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
In that regard, it is axiomatic that “a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
  Tresa VanWinkle is a registered nurse and executive director of CAPPED Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:03 am by Michael Elkon
Nichiha USA, Inc., Civil Case No. 09-CV-3932-LS, 2009 WL 3540796 (E.D. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:01 am
Nevada, Inc., LVI Environmental of Nevada, Inc., Marnell Masonry, Inc., Mechanical Insulation Specialists, Midwest Drywall Co., Inc., Midwest Pro Painting, Inc., Modernfold of Nevada, LLC, Paramount Management Enterprises, Southern Nevada Paving, Inc., Universal Piping, Inc., W&W Steel LLC of Nevada, and West Edna & Associates.netDockets has made a complimentary copy of the notice of appeal available on… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:30 am by Steven V. Buckman
Comanche Cattle Industries, Inc., 1975 OK CIV APP 67, 545 P.2d 827, the Oklahoma Court of Appeals explained the reason for limiting damages: This interest is given legal protection to achieve the paramount objective of putting the promisee injured by the breach in the position in which he would have been had the contract been performed. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
"Usually it's not outright thievery by the studios, but death by contract," Bloomberg quotes Pierce O'Donnel, the Los Angeles-based lawyer who represented the late columnist Art Buchwald in a successful case against Viacom Inc,s Paramount Pictures in 1988. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:53 pm
On January 8, 2009, the Supreme Court of California issued a unanimous decision in Prospect Medical Group Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka v Axelrod (IP… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:18 am
’s Fox, Universal, Paramount and Sony — are ganging up to sue RealNetworks Inc. over a new software program, called RealDVD, that let’s consumers copy DVDs onto computers. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
Here's the Court's outline (as formatted by Deadline Hollywood): 1986-90: Fox acquires motion picture rights in The Watchmen. 1990: Fox enters into a domestic distribution agreement with Largo Entertainment, a joint venture of JVC Entertainment Inc., Golar (Larry Gordon), and BOH, Inc. [read post]