Search for: "Party X v. Party Y" Results 141 - 160 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
There are also many audit schemes ranging from the USDA GAPs to third party audits that are all intended to contribute to the production of safe leafy greens, and other produce. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am by Joseph Fishkin
If you really care about avoiding violations of a prohibition on X, you can build a fence around it by adding a prohibition on Y, where Y is somehow adjacent to X, and especially where it may be possible to confuse the two. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:58 pm by scottgaille
To better address the complexity of subsurface conditions, construction agreements can include more detailed definitions of Site Condition and Unanticipated Site Condition: “Site Condition” means the natural or man-made physical, surface, subsurface, and other conditions at the site and the surrounding area as a whole, including (a) conditions relating to the environment, transportation, access, waste disposal, handling or storage of materials; (b) the availability or quality of… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm by Sasha Volokh
As Jonathan writes, the Supreme Court (in Kisor v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
[Y] by order of SPDC and / or a representative of SPDC attended the meeting (s) where these witnesses had to prepare / sign the statements prepared by others and / or [b.] [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
Here are some examples that I bet every care lawyer has seen at least once : social worker sitting in their car around the corner from a family home waiting to see if the violent ex turns back up and is let in, or if his car is still there in the morning, or routinely arriving a few minutes early to see if they can catch them out. social worker on unannounced visit when family are out peering in the window and recording the carnage they see inside - or peering over the gate to see if that mouldy… [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 12:52 pm
  On appeal, the losing party totally abandons Argument X and instead relies on a totally different Argument Y. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:07 am by Justin Levitt
Here’s the question: “If the state has a law or constitutional amendment that’s saying all legitimate factors must be used in a way to favor party X or party Y, is that lawful? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
One amicus brief often praised by Plaintiffs’ counsel was submitted by Professor Kenneth Rothman and colleagues.2 This amicus brief is still cited by parties who find support in the brief for their excuses for not having consistent, valid, strong, and statistically significance evidence to support their claims of causation. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 1:51 pm
Bank X may decide not to accept anything less than a Certificate in order to authorize the Estate Trustees to deal with a bank account of the deceased, for example, while Bank Y may be satisfied with a certified copy of the will appointing them. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
But it also suggested a high tolerance for actions which would be anathema in Europe.Taken together, the PDCA appears to give both parties what they want most. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
  Political Party X wants to not count those votes because they're likely not for X, whereas Political Party Y deeply cares about counting them because they're likely for Y. [read post]