Search for: "People v Kent"
Results 141 - 160
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
I think that's mostly because 2008 had the moratorium due to Baze v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” Commentary on the case comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, here and here. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Two people involved in landmark Supreme Court decisions died recently. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
County of Kent, 510 U.S. 355 (1994). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:20 am
The justices return to the virtual bench for oral arguments, starting Monday at 10 a.m. with Pham v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:10 pm
New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:13 am
Kent School District (08-1130). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
Oral arguments in King v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
This makes Robinson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Welch v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:00 am
See, People v James D. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
d v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 4:49 am
The scenario is the sort that would make for a great law school argument about the merit of a doctrine taken to its logical extreme, except that the logical extreme actually played out before the 9th Circuit in US v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
But below the radar, the Executive Branch is engaging in the same type of infighting—on issues that matter and have the potential to harm LGB people across the country.Attorney General Jeff Sessions filed an unsolicited brief in Zarda v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
“It's a list of aspirations,” said Richard Gonzalez, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law who is working on the case pro bono.So Bees isn't her real name, and a law professor takes the case pro bono. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. [read post]
