Search for: "Prior v. Warden"
Results 141 - 160
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
(See prior related posting.)In Lovelace v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
To access editions of Petitions to Watch from prior terms, visit our archives here on SCOTUSwiki. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Francis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil RightsState Prisoner May Add Wardens, Prison Doctors To Complaint Alleging Hepatitis C ContractionMabry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:10 am
Warden, Rikers Island Correctional FacilityRICHMOND COUNTYTortsConstructive Notice Not Imputed by Ticket Taker; Opera Granted Dismissal of Plaintiff's Injury ClaimsPinto v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Callahan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:26 am
Warden, Anna M. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
OpinionShort Title/District 08a0004p.06 Staunch v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 4:25 am
(See prior related posting.)In Alston v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
I, Jackson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Francis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
V. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:41 pm
Moreover, those opinions also makeit clear that a thorough examination of the trial record, as 2 EMMETT v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 4:31 am
SC07-1499 v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
