Search for: "Robert W. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 6 January 2020, Besanko J gave judgment in the case of Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications [2020] FCA 2 dismissing an application for disclosure of confidential sources. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 2:03 pm by Bridget Crawford
Brady, Cambridge – Assistant Professor, Harvard Law School   Minnesota Garry W. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith  [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  In 1981, a recommendation from Rehnquist got Roberts a position in the newly installed Reagan administration, as a special assistant to Attorney General William French Smith. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Walker (Boston University), on Thursday, August 8, 2019 Tags: Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Taxation Five Takeaways From the 2019 Proxy Season Posted by Steve W. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Gillian Metzger remarks that in Gundy, “Chief Justice Roberts joined an extreme [dissenting] opinion that threatens to disrupt a basic and longstanding feature of modern government, unnecessarily undercuts a co-equal branch’s ability to function, and clearly advances a strongly partisan anti-regulatory agenda”; she warns that “if Gundy is any sign of things to come, John Roberts the institutionalist has left the building. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:26 am by David M. Offen
Census data shows there are over 30,000 living examples for the top four most common combinations; John Smith, Robert Smith, Michael Smith, and Maria Garcia. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Lund. 50 Connecticut Law Review 849-985 (2018).Allan W. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” At Procedurally Taxing, Carlton Smith considers the implications for tax law of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fort Bend County v. [read post]