Search for: "Roberts v. State of Iowa"
Results 141 - 160
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s remarks before an audience of incoming law students, in which she stated that “senators refusing to vote on President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court should recognize a president is elected for four years not three. . . [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:12 am
Roberts and Associates today. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Immigration lawyers, reeling from yesterday’s defeat in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
Roberts announces that Justice Elena Kagan has the opinion in Mathis v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:36 am
The case, Mathis v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
(Shepard documents, named after the 2005 decision in Shepard v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case: United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
The Court’s deferral of these questions can be chalked up, at least in part, to the nature of the case itself, in which employees at a pork processing plant in Iowa claimed they had not received overtime pay for time spent “donning and doffing” protective equipment for their jobs, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) and Iowa state law. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:49 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 opinion in State Farm v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The plaintiffs filed a putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and class action under Iowa state law, seeking overtime compensation for time spent donning and doffing protective gear. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The plaintiffs filed a putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and class action under Iowa state law, seeking overtime compensation for time spent donning and doffing protective gear. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:21 pm
See Steiner v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Anthony v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:03 am
In Tyson Foods, a group of workers brought a proposed Rule 23(b)(3) class action against their employer for unpaid overtime in violation of Iowa state wage-and-hour law as well as a putative collective action under the FLSA. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm
That would leave the rather bizarre effect that the mandate was in effect in much of the nation, but not in the seven states that are located in the Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
The case involves claims of undercompensated overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and Iowa state wage law by current and former Tyson employees at a single pork-processing plant in Storm Lake, Iowa. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
The case involves claims of undercompensated overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and Iowa state wage law by current and former Tyson employees at a single pork-processing plant in Storm Lake, Iowa. [read post]
