Search for: "Roger Lord " Results 141 - 160 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by emagraken
Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at paragraph 16: …Causation need not be determined by scientific precision; as Lord Salmon stated in Alphacell Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
 The judges (Lords Justices Maurice Kay, Stanley Brunton -- who gave the leading judgment -- and Lewison) were not persuaded that the Bolkiah rule was of broad application beyond solicitors. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
According to Press Gazette, Lord Justice Leveson was concerned by how the story leaked, although he did not directly refer to the horse: “I am concerned to hear that over the last two days requests have been made to the Metropolitan Police for confirmation of details which suggest that there has been prior disclosure of the statements of some of the witnesses who are due to give evidence to this inquiry“. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Dan Wootton, former showbiz editor at the News of the World, told Lord Justice Leveson he believes all celebrities have a right to privacy, especially in areas of sexuality, health, pregnancy and family. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:55 am by Wendy
/ edited by Michael Tonry. * The end of negotiable instruments: bringing payments systems law out of the past / James Steven Rogers. * Native claims: indigenous law against empire, 1500-1920 / edited by Saliha Belmessous. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
Sumption sworn in Jonathan Sumption QC was sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice on 11th January (he is now Lord Sumption). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
 According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that employee is able to satisfy the court… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
While Lord Justice Leveson made it clear that the Dowler story was not the only reason for the Inquiry, he will be looking into the new developments. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by Mandelman
  Even Lord Blankcheck over at Goldman Sachs takes his calls. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:22 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford We have certain images in our minds about that first Thanksgiving. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:02 am by INFORRM
Further reading: Steven Barnett’s recent piece for Inforrm and his written evidence [PDF] to the Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions Roger Bolton’s evidence to the House of Lords Communication Committee [PDF] Tweets from the event at #pccdebate, @mediasociety and @wnol. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:41 am by James Hamilton
Lord Sharman was the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for Trade and Industry/Business and Regulatory Reform from 2001 to 2010. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
The witnesses were Jack Straw MP, Lord Wakeham, Sir Stephen Sedley, and Professor Gavin Phillipson. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am by Melina Padron
Roger Masterman and Jo Murkens tried to establish what kind of court is the UK Supreme Court, with particular reference to its constitutional status. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
A recent post asks -  Roger Masterman and Jo Murkens: What Kind of a Court is the UK Supreme Court? [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
Lord Roger (at para. 76) inverted the question posed in this case, questioning whether: a straight man or woman could find it reasonably tolerable to conceal his or her sexual identity indefinitely to avoid suffering persecution. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by admin
Lord John Whorfin, Buckaroo Banzai Across the Eighth Dimension   Now that we’ve established lenders can pursue foreclosed homeowners after the property is lost, and that they (or their successors in interest) will pursue these homeowners, what should happen? [read post]