Search for: "Samsung Electronics Company, Limited"
Results 141 - 160
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 8:16 pm
Oracle also received direct support from sizable companies (Microsoft, EMC, NetApp). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:57 am
Also, Samsung is unlikely to have leverage with its non-SEPs-in-suit, which isn't Google's fault but means Samsung can't solve the problem through its counterclaims.MAJOR defeat for Google:Foxconn parent Hon Hai signs with Microsoft: 20th royalty-bearing Android patent license dealThis company manufactures more than 40 percent of the world's consumer electronics. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Case New Holland, Inc.), did not support Samsung's assertions. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm
Here, Judge Koh concluded that there is an inconsistency, but it can and must stand.The jury held not only two Samsung U.S. subsidiaries but also Samsung Electronics Corporation, a Korean entity, liable for direct infringement. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
Electronics had 2 patents out of the 47, Thomas Licensing S.A. held 4, Bharat Heavy Electrical Held 2, Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:11 am
Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:26 am
I wanted to take the time (despite all the Apple-Samsung action yesterday) to identify the most interesting parts of those filings. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Samsung case has ordered that Apple's license with HTC be produced to Samsung in connection with the discovery for the upcoming permanent injunction hearing. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:47 pm
The original July 18, 2012 order by Judge Colin Birss of the Patent Court, granted Samsung’s request to require Apple to publish a simple, one-paragraph statement on its website, and in a number of print publications: “On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet computers, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design 000181607-0001.… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:05 am
Jaar – http://bit.ly/Q1z8ha (Ralph Losey) FTC and ITC Issue New Final and Proposed Rules on Electronic Discovery (PDF) http://bit.ly/RmoQ6k (Cahill) Hoarders: How to Change the ‘Keep Everything’ Attitude that’s Drowning Your Company – http://bit.ly/PU7QcD (Mauricio Perry) Hyland Software Establishes UK Subsidiary – http://sacb.ee/Q2aVXZ (PR Newswire) In-Place eDiscovery: Exchange 2013 – http://bit.ly/PVdOdk (Microsoft TechNet Library) Is… [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:24 pm
This is what it says: Samsung / Apple UK judgment On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:19 pm
A company should perform IP audits from time to time, interviewing key personnel from various functions, such as R&D, marketing, sales, legal and financial, in order to compile a list of the company’s sensitive information. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:46 pm
You can view Apple’s statement on the ruling here: Read the full Court of Appeal judgment issued on October 18, 2002 here: (Judgment: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:46 pm
You can view Apple’s statement on the ruling here: Read the full Court of Appeal judgment issued on October 18, 2002 here: (Judgment: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:12 am
The diversity of inventive pursuits and of modern technology counsels against limiting the analysis in this way. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:17 am
The lawsuit between Apple, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. over issues of patent infringement finally came to a close with a judgment in Apple's favor. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
Take a look at all the Apple claims in the Samsung trial via The Verge. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
(“Apple”) made headlines most recently for its $1.05 billion victory over Samsung in patent litigation in the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:13 pm
It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Samsung and Apple v. [read post]
