Search for: "Samuel Thomas"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
Three justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have denied the Biden administration’s request, calling Friday’s order “unreasoned” and “highly disturbing. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas indicated that he would have granted Missouri’s request, while two of his colleagues – Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch – wrote separately to clarify their understanding of the scope of the lower court’s order. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Samuel Alito explained in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:00 pm
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh indicated that they would have allowed the ban on enforcement of the rule to continue. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:20 pm
John Gore argued on behalf of South Carolina Senate President Thomas Alexander, who is the defendant in the case. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:03 pm
” Thomas’s question was another good sign for the state. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
“But there was no fire,” Justice Samuel Alito tells Wall, though he was setting up what seems like a friendly question. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson echoed Thomas’s sentiment. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch echoed Thomas’s concern. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Then-Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas, put forward the argument that eventually prevailed in Sackett: Namely, that wetlands and waterbodies that have no surface connection to navigable, CWA-protected waterbodies are not WOTUS and thus do not qualify for CWA protections. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:48 am
In an opinion joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, Justice Samuel Alito suggested that the court did not need to intervene yet. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 2:21 am
Brett Samuels reports for The Hill. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Blume, Samuel S. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Justices Thomas and Gorsuch are the Court’s most ardent originalists. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
What Ginni Thomas and Leonard Leo Wrought: How a justice’s wife and a key activist started a movement MSN – Heidi Przybyla (Politico) | Published: 9/10/2023 The U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:33 pm
“The Supreme Court’s Growing Ethics Splits: Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are defiant, the rest are varying levels of quiet. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Hugh’s College, University of Oxford; Global Professor of Law, NYU School of Law "Equity, banking, and the seeds of crisis: Foley v Hill (1838-48)" October 11 Brittany Farr, Assistant Professor of Law, NYU School of Law "The Other Walker-Thomas: Reading Race in Contracts" October 25 Shaun Ossei-Owusu, Presidential Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School "Social Engineers on a Grand Scale? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Thomas. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
(Marc Ramirez, USA Today) Samuel Alito Is Wrong and Arrogant—and Must Be Reined In (Norman J. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]