Search for: "Shields v. United States of America"
Results 141 - 160
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that Monday’s decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
Canada’s major trading partners including the United States and the European Union recognize that net neutrality rules do not prevent courts or government agencies from ordering the removal of illegal content from the Internet. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:57 am
(Carsey-Werner Company, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
The United Nations continues this work through its many mandate holders. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The data trade war will be exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in the United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm
” The United States has also defended cluster munitions on the rationale that their use could create less collateral damage than the alternative of unitary weapons and argued they might be particularly useful in dealing with adversaries who use civilian shields. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
To start at the beginning, the United States is based on a basic proposition: assume everyone who has power is likely to abuse it. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
Last time the CJEU reviewed US privacy law, in Schrems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
If the CJEU holds that U.S. surveillance violates European privacy laws, it will reject standard clauses, the new Privacy Shield, and any other method companies have used to shuttle private data from Europe to America. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
[Note 1: Gucci America v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010). [read post]
