Search for: "State v. Shannon S."
Results 141 - 160
of 571
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 1:11 pm
In Luv n’ care, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court, which failed this year to decide a case that could have a major impact in eastern Oklahoma, has chosen a different path to determine whether tribal reservations in the state were officially terminated,” agreeing on Friday to review McGirt v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Today’s second argument is in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Edited by Shannon Stettner, Kristin Burnett & Travis Hay. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:01 pm
Loewy’s article United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Gee, which asks whether a decision upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital conflicts with the Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:41 am
Louisiana October 7, 2019 – Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Shannon’s presentation was entitled, “Pursuing Outpatient & Jail-Based Competency Restoration as Alternatives to Overcrowded State Hospitals: A Texas Experience. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Ghana’s Constitutional history from 1840 to 1960Nikki Kalbing, U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:55 am
Contents include:Forum: The Trump Administration and International Law Jack Goldsmith & Shannon Togawa Mercer, International Law and Institutions in the Trump Era Focus: International Health Law Nele Matz-Lück, Introduction Pedro A. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
In addition to finding that Liskow’s removal satisfied federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that the removal satisfied the requirements of CAFA and the Court accepted Liskow’s arguments against the application of CAFA’s local controversy and home state exceptions and CAFA’s governmental entity exclusion. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
In addition to finding that Liskow’s removal satisfied federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that the removal satisfied the requirements of CAFA and the Court accepted Liskow’s arguments against the application of CAFA’s local controversy and home state exceptions and CAFA’s governmental entity exclusion. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:54 am
In addition to finding that Liskow’s removal satisfied federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that the removal satisfied the requirements of CAFA and the Court accepted Liskow’s arguments against the application of CAFA’s local controversy and home state exceptions and CAFA’s governmental entity exclusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
United States,66 Buff. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
