Search for: "The Presiding Justices of The First, Second, Third and Fourth Departments"
Results 141 - 160
of 642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Second, there is no non-corrupt reason to fire Rosenstein. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:32 pm
Note that Trump was not president at the time and that, therefore, no question arises at this stage as to whether a president can obstruct justice by exercising his constitutional authority to supervise the executive branch. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 3:52 pm
Second, why let the president's private attorneys see the Mueller report before everyone else? [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
The Justice Department has now filed a notice of appeal and a motion to partially stay U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Department of Justice, moderated panelists: Jeremy J. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
The first possibility is that the Justice Department has declined to challenge the MOUs because they are nonbinding. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:12 am
Its expected arrival at the Justice Department had been reported by a number of news outlets, but about its content, no solid information was available. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:27 am
Department of Justice recently updated its extensive guidance to federal prosecutors across the country regarding how to evaluate corporate compliance programs. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:49 pm
First, there must be a recommendation by the District Attorney or the court 'that the defendant be investigated for the purpose of determining whether he is eligible to be adjudged a youthful offender'; second, if the recommendation be made by the District Attorney, as it was in this case, it must have the approval of the court; third, the defendant must consent to a physical and mental examination, if deemed necessary, to an investigation and questioning and to… [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:20 am
Second, it is my understanding that some of those working on the case were from the Public Integrity Section of Main Justice. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
They primarily addressed targeting and Fourth Amendment compliance. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
Fourth, what about Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:09 am
Hours before the Times published the letter on Saturday, the president tweeted, “Is the Special Counsel/Justice Department leaking my lawyers [sic] letters to the Fake News Media? [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
At the age of twenty-five, you founded your first business, CDA Investment Technologies. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
As Jon Alder observed, for the first time, four female Justices were in dissent: Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
It is not hyperbole to recall the trenchant words of Chief Justice John Marshall: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
McGahn, and the Department of Justice, asserted absolute immunity from the subpoena. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
Third, expanding the Court’s moderate wing could have broader benefits by addressing some of the yawning disparities in education that contribute to the need for affirmative action in the first place. [read post]
