Search for: "U S Dept of Defense"
Results 141 - 160
of 227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
In Matter of Lamarcus E.,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1211389 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
Forchelli & Forchelli 17 AD3d 343 (2 Dept 2005), citing Shopsin Siben Siben 268 AD2d 578 (2 Dept 2000); see also, Pechko Gendelman, 20 AD3d 404 (2 Dept 2005).. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
D‘Alessandro, 2010 WL 2652447 [Ist Dept 20101). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
" Spoliation sanctions ... are not limited to cases where the evidence was destroyed willfully or in bad faith, since a party's negligent loss of evidence can be just as fatal to the other party's ability to present a defense'" (Standard Fire Ins. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
A number of appellate court decisions, such as Matter of Williamson, 259 AD2d 362 (1st Dept 1999), Matter of HGK Asset Management, Inc., 228 AD2d 246 (1st Dept 1996), and Matter of Goodman, 200 AD2d 670 (2d Dept 1994), authorize the trial court to grant dissolution without an evidentiary hearing in cases where, whether by motion to dismiss or by answer, the respondent fails to raise material issues of fact in response to the petition's allegations… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Rather, Lopresti’s and/or Bamundo Zwal’s own inaction caused the untimely commencement of the underlying case. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Brest's article initiated an intense theoretical debate over the merits of originalism that continues today. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:24 am
U. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Defendant raises a series of defenses, including res judicata and collateral estoppel. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Slip Op. 07328 (NYAD 3 Dept) Petitioner (father) and respondent (mother) were the parents of two sons (born in 2007 and 2008). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
Defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) is also denied inasmuch as defendant's affidavit and the documents attached thereto do not definitively and "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted action as a matter of law" (Leon, 84 NY2d at 88); the documentary evidence merely raises numerous issues of fact, rather than finally dispose of them (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 435 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:18 am
Nonetheless, UR might have worked far more effectively for insurance defense carriers and attorneys if they had used Illinois doctors for their reports. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded for further proceedings, but expressed no view as to whether dismissal was warranted based on other defenses raised by the city. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:57 pm
Term 1st Dept. 2011) Prima facie defenses to a 45-day or 30-day rule violation now requires “due consideration” to the explanation the provider gave. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:48 am
Schulman, 2 A.D.3d 355, 358 (1st Dept. 2003). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Slawski, CPA, P.C., 2011 NY Slip Op 30476(U) (Sup Ct NY County Feb. 28, 2011), decided earlier this year by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Judith J. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
" Unanimity Requirement in General Partners' Stockholder Agreement Bars Defense of Foreclosure Action Against Limited Partnership Crane, A.G. v. 206 West 41st Street Hotel Associates, L.P., 2011 NY Slip Op 05434 (1st Dept June 23, 2011). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Neslon (U. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
State Dept of L&I, Docket no. 56301-7 (Division I, April 16, 2007). [read post]
