Search for: "U. S. Trustee" Results 141 - 160 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 1:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Taher ;2011 NY Slip Op 51208(U) ;Decided on July 1, 2011 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Schack, J. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Leah Malone, Emily Holland, and Carolyn Houston, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, March 11, 2023 Editor's Note: Leah Malone is a Partner, Emily B. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Leah Malone, Emily Holland, and Carolyn Houston, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, March 11, 2023 Editor's Note: Leah Malone is a Partner, Emily B. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In 2009 and 2010, Cuppy allegedly impeded collection efforts by falsely stating that he did not have authority to instruct the trustee about the disposition of assets; did not cause the trustee to distribute funds to Rogan’s wife; and had not taken steps to ensure that the trustee would not produce documents in response to Dexia’s discovery efforts. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 11:00 am by Gerald M. Dorn, Estate Planning Attorney
The first five letters say exactly what you should do with them: t-r-u-s-t them. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:01 am by J Eric Lockridge and Katilyn Hollowell
  The 8-0 opinion written by Justice Alito, and particularly the separate concurring opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, cautioned that a creditor holding a bankrupt debtor’s property could easily run afoul of Section 362(a)(4) or (6) (prohibiting acts to enforce liens and to collect a claim, respectively), or of Section 542(a)’s obligation to deliver property to the debtor or trustee. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
In 2009, Scott filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy and in January of 2010 he met with the “Trustee for the United States, the Trustee's counsel, and the Trustee's accounting firm, Verdolino & Lowey (V & L). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:32 pm
Trustees response suggested that the motion should be denied as unnecessary, and suggested that the plain language of the statute made it clear that debtor’s counsel did not fall within the statutory definition. [read post]