Search for: "US Foam, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 8:25 am
Practitioners in California are familiar with AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:55 am
True, the case, and the court decision has allowed activists to foam at the mouth about a “crisis” in Internet service. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:33 am
Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
It found that the ‘858 patent would not have been obvious because it is not simply a combination of elements found in the prior art, which would actually teach away from the use of foam straps. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:24 pm
The record shows that the prior art would actually discourage and teach away from the use of foam straps. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:48 pm
Regarding obviousness, the Federal Circuit found that the record showed that the prior art actually taught away from the use of foam straps as claimed in the ‘858 patent because foam was likely to stretch and deform, and cause the wearer discomfort. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:45 am
Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:33 am
Items burned in the pits have included medical waste, plastics, computer parts, oil, lubricants, paint, tires and foam cups, according to soldiers and contractors. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:59 pm
And “jet fuel was sometimes used as an accelerant. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:29 pm
/S.A., a global manufacturer of a foams and synthetic compounds used in the automotive, bedding, and building industries. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
If you missed the coverage, here is the kerfuffle catalyst from the Crocs, Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:04 pm
All One God Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 12:12 am
(a global manufacturer of a wide range of foams and synthetic compounds that are primarily used in the automotive, bedding, and building industries), voluntarily filed for chapter 11 protection in the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
US Foam, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
Jason Hearst (Hearst) was hired by Progressive Foam Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:22 pm
A press release on July 24 from patent challenger Smith & Nephew indicates that Kinetic Concepts [KCI] has won a round in the US re-examination fight but suggests outcomes have been different in other jurisdictions (countries):Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Patent Office) has issued actions in re-examination proceedings involving three of the negative pressure wound therapy… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom KCI foam dressing patent held valid, but does anyone know what happened? [read post]
