Search for: "USA v. Bonds"
Results 141 - 160
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Trademark vs branding – Sci Fi Channel will now be called Syfy (China Hearsay) Europe CFI: Mars loses CTM right in 3D shape for chocolate snacks: Mars v OHIM, Ludwig Schokolade (Class 46) (The IP Factor) CFI: James Bond fails again to defeat DR. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Long before the elections of 2016, the American Republic had been moving toward more formal and open hostilities in the cultural civil war, one with social, economic, cultural and political consequences, that was one of the great consequences of the immediate post 1945 period. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:14 am
USA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
TECHNIP USA CORPORATION AND TECHNIP, S. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships, USA Today (last updated April 2, 2020). [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
In October 2016, the ACLU filed a motion seeking access to the court’s opinions and orders from Sept. 11, 2001 through the passage of the USA Freedom Act in 2015 (in which Congress required some declassification of opinions but which did not apply to prior opinions). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
Each trust is not an operating business, but mere a special legal entity created for securitization purposes, i.e. for selling bonds to investors, with the packages of student loans transferred to it – the trust assets - constituting the collateral and yielding proceeds [or expected to yield proceeds] for distribution to the bond-holders once the student loans would enter the repayment period after the student-borrowers’ graduation. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
Attorney's Office this morning, says this breaking story by Patsy Brumfield and Errol Castens in the Daily Journal.UPDATE: I've had a chance to pull all the current entries on the docket in USA v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
IJ Senior Attorney Robert Everett Johnson has more at USA Today. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:25 am
Of course, the article is wrong in blaming muni bonds, which aren’t included in AGI in the first place. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
On the contrary, the Government should welcome an inquiry by the Court, so that if it is found that there are in fact bonded labourers or even if the workers are not bonded in the strict sense of the term as defined in the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 but they are made to provide forced labour or any consigned to a life of utter deprivation and degradation, such a situation can be set right by the Government.39. [read post]
