Search for: "United Citizens Party of South Carolina" Results 141 - 160 of 358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Raftery
North Carolina HB 640 was introduced April 5 and is currently pending in the House Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee C. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:36 pm by Bill Raftery
House: Any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision violates the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable if such court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the constitutions of this… [read post]
” Perhaps most surprising: despite early hype about the Apple-Google API, only Oklahoma, Alabama, South Carolina and Virginia currently plan to use the Silicon Valley compan [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
” Moreover, any inference that “he” and “men” were generic was weakened on Aug. 29, when Pierce Butler of South Carolina proposed, and the convention adopted, the first draft of the Fugitive Slave Clause. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
No Arkansas SB 97 Prohibits any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am by Bill Raftery
No Arkansas SB 97 Prohibits any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted… [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Any US citizen found in the service of either of the parties at war “will be abandoned to the penalties which the laws of war authorise. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Much is poured into the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:20 am by Ruby Powers
For most Central and South American immigrants, the wait for a visa that allows for legal immigration to the United States can stretch for two decades or more. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
The Citizens United ruling rolled back limits that had existed for some time on corporate and unit expenditures. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by Bill Raftery
Arkansas SB 97 Prohibits any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:21 am by Joe May
Supreme Court seemed prepared to strike down a part of federal campaign finance law left intact by its decision in Citizens United in 2010: overall limits on direct contributions from individuals to candidates. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 7:15 am
We’re empowering volunteers, especially in the states with early primaries and caucuses like New Hampshire, Iowa, South Carolina, and Nevada, to meet the candidates on the trail and record their answers on what they will do about criminal justice reform, access to voting, reproductive freedom, and immigrant justice. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 12:22 pm by Daniel Richman
Wrongs against individual citizens, however, were of little federal concern—except when the government put its institutions and personnel at the disposal of Southern slaveholders seeking to return “fugitive slaves. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am by William Eskridge
In short order, marriage equality plaintiffs and supporters will prevail in North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia (all Fourth Circuit), as well as Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming (Tenth Circuit). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
South Carolina, 13-8037, another new relist, involves a constitutional challenge to a South Carolina statute (that state’s version of “Jessica’s Law”) that imposes mandatory GPS monitoring for released sex offenders. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:34 pm by The Charge
Sandford - questions never raised, never briefed, not germane and contrary to common belief at the time - was that Congress could not regulate slavery in federal territories and that no person of African descent could be a citizen of the United States or any state therein.So, in 1856, four years before South Carolina would secede from the Union ultimately bringing Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Georgia, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and North… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:09 am by Alden Fletcher
Without first consulting the president, the French minister to United States, Edmond-Charles Genet, began commissioning privateers out Charleston, South Carolina to fight the British. [read post]