Search for: "V D"
Results 141 - 160
of 75,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 9:33 am
CIVIL – DAMAGES DA 15-0463, 2016 MT 140N, CREED MILES EVANS, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
Supp. 2d ----, 2007 WL 867986 (D. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:23 am
Per Jordan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 5:26 am
I'd be curious to hear what people think of the recent SCOTUS decision in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
Posted by D. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:02 am
Brian D. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:56 am
Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, Poland; Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland; Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, Poland; Regina (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20; [2012] WLR (D) 158 “When a notice of appeal against an extradition decision had an irregularity which could be cured by amendment and the circumstances merited that, the court had jurisdiction to permit the amendment and… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
HJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HT v Same ú [2010] UKSC 31; [2010] WLR (D) 174 “To reject a gay person’s claim for refugee status on the ground that, if returned to his home country, he could avoid persecution by living discreetly would be to deny his right, protected by the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, to live freely and openly as himself without fear of persecution. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:51 am
Gray v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Coogan v Same [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 65 “The words ‘technical or commercial information’ in the definition of ‘intellectual property’ in section 72(5) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, section 72 (1) of which provided for the withdrawal of privilege against self or spousal incrimination in proceedings for, inter alia, infringement of rights pertaining to any intellectual property, meant… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 am
Regina (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (MM (Burma)) v Same [2010] UKSC 36; [2010] WLR (D) 203 “An asylum seeker who made a new application for asylum after his original application for asylum had finally failed, was entitled to the benefits conferred by the European Directive setting minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:48 am
Aktas v Adepta; Dixie v British Polythene Industries plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1170 ; [2010] WLR(D) 269 “Negligent failure to serve a claim form in time for the purposes of CPR rr 7.5/7.6 was not in itself an abuse of process. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm
The D. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:32 am
R v Freeman; R v Crawford [2008] EWCA Crim 1863; [2008] WLR (D) 287 “Some care was required in directing a jury when approaching the cross-admissibility of bad character evidence. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:34 am
Copley v Lawn; Maden v Haller [2009] EWCA Civ 580; [2009] WLR (D) 200 “Where, following a road accident caused by a defendant's negligence, the defendant's insurers offered to provide a ‘free’ replacement car to the claimant while his own car was being repaired, the claimant could reasonably reject or ignore the offer if it did [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
R v Erskine; R v Williams [2009] EWCA Crim 1425; [2009] WLR (D) 241 “Where an appeal against a conviction for murder raised the issue of diminished responsibility for the first time, the parties should provide the court with a detailed analysis of the relevant facts in order to assist the court in deciding whether evidence not [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:52 am
R v Gore; R v Maher [2009] EWCA Crim 1424; [2009] WLR (D) 240 “The issue of a fixed penalty notice asserting one offence did not relieve the recipient of any possible further proceedings if and when it became apparent that a more serious offence had in fact been committed in the course of the same [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:18 am
R v JTB (on appeal from R v T) [2009] UKHL 20; [2009] WLR(D) 140 “S 34 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 abolished the defence as well as the presumption of doli incapax. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 10:57 pm
See Claiborne v. [read post]
