Search for: "Walton v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am by jonathanturley
” Critics charged that Walton’s public statements ran afoul of Canon 3A(6) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states: “A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  This so-called “[c]ommon-defense exception,” Walton v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Supreme Court granted Retirement Systems motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action as "time barred" and Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, the Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's decision, noting "where [the] proceeding could have been brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78, the four-month statute of limitations applicable to such proceedings… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Supreme Court granted Retirement Systems motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action as "time barred" and Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, the Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's decision, noting "where [the] proceeding could have been brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78, the four-month statute of limitations applicable to such proceedings… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Laura Sandwell
Walton v The Scottish Ministers, heard 9 – 10 July 2012. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
Last week, when the California budget was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger, he cut state funding for the ombudsman program. [read post]