Search for: "Wells County Board of Zoning Appeals"
Results 141 - 160
of 309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2017, 5:02 pm
The Board of Supervisors upheld the denial on appeal. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:54 pm
Monumedia challenged the City’s decision before the Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”), and challenged the DOT’s decision before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) from the Office of State Administrative Hearings (“OSAH”), but was unsuccessful in both cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763, 795.) [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763, 795.) [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered partially published on August 24, 2017, the Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition brought by a citizens group (Highway 68) on CEQA and Planning and Zoning Law grounds, and upheld the Monterey County Board of Supervisors’ 2012 approval of a shopping center project. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered partially published on August 24, 2017, the Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition brought by a citizens group (Highway 68) on CEQA and Planning and Zoning Law grounds, and upheld the Monterey County Board of Supervisors’ 2012 approval of a shopping center project. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:26 am
The Board denied the variance request, and Carlson appealed to the District Court, which upheld the Board’s decision. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The Planning Board left open the record for the submission of a traffic study by 7-Eleven, as well as further public comment. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
Middlesex Township Zoning Hearing Board v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 3:57 pm
” It initially sought to proceed only with aggregate and concrete production, but later sought the County board’s determination whether resumption of asphalt production would be considered a “new or changed” industrial use under the applicable zoning; the board declared by 2015 resolution it would not be, and that the use was permitted subject to the 2002 use permit conditions. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:11 am
Plaintiff’s fight with defendants wound its way through the planning commission and zoning board, the circuit court, and even included an appeal to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
County’s Ordinances Amending Its Zoning Code The three ordinances at issue amended the Planning and Zoning Regulations title of County’s Code. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Located in the City’s planning and zoning “sphere of influence,” it is also within the coastal zone, and hence regulated under the Coastal Act, which requires a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for development. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
County’s Board voted to accept the planning department’s recommendation to tentatively certify the FEIR and approve the plan and related general plan and zone changes, with the modifications incorporated. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
A county board denied the Murrs a variance, and after losing that appeal, they asserted an unconstitutional taking. [read post]
