Search for: "ZIMMER US, INC."
Results 141 - 160
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 4:23 pm
The high rate of failure has raised serious concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of the implants, and device manufacturers such as Johnson & Johnson or Zimmer Holding Inc. are being required to provide more consistent testing to reduce failure rates. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Zimmer, Inc., 474 F. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2011 WL 5509420, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Zimmer, Inc., 474 F. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:29 am
Manufacturers of the devices include Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Zimmer Holdings Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:46 am
Since the recall in August of 2010, there has been heightened scrutiny over the materials used in replacement hips. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
Since the recall in August of 2010, there has been heightened scrutiny over the materials used in replacement hips. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Zimmer, Inc. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Judge Rakoff may well have had help in confusing the probability used to characterize the plaintiff’s burden of proof with the probability of attained significance. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
Or, if knowing the largest pharmaceutical MDL to date is something you can use as an ice breaker. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
That case, Zimmer US, Inc., v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm
Zimmer, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
This footnote strikes us as frankly bizarre. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Zimmer, Inc., 2011 WL 3652411, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 11:24 am
Zimmer Holdings Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:08 am
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Zimmer, Inc., 211 Fed. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
“The mere presence of [other safety devices] somewhere at the work site” does not satisfy defendant’s duty to provide appropriate safety devices (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 524, rearg denied 65 NY2d 1054; see Williams v City of Niagara Falls, 43 AD3d 1426; Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc., 28 AD3d 1105, 1106). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Men’s Wearhouse Inc., No. [read post]
