Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 1601 - 1620 of 19,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2008, 6:10 am
7-19-2008 Indiana:Civil suit filed against prosecutor's office, sheriff's departmentWhen John C. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
  It does not occur automatically, by operation of law, simply by reason of the dependent child reaching the age of majority). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:52 pm by Michael Cannan
In around 19 states, insurance jumps by 50 percent or more following an accident. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:32 pm
The following is based on a review of 2,642 patents related to MEMS and is based on patent breadth which does not necessarily indicate technical or economic value (or validity) of the patents.1. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam
Here is the Key Liability Protection Provision: 2 (1) No cause of action arises against any person as a direct or indirect result of an individual being or potentially being infected with or exposed to coronavirus (COVID-19) on or after March 17, 2020 as a direct or indirect result of an act or omission of the person if, (a) at the relevant time, the person acted or made a good faith effort to act in accordance with, (i) public health guidance relating to coronavirus… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Tarunabh Khaitan
The Chief Justice’s argument is not entirely convincing because it does not explain why the scope and content of the right in question, i.e Article 19(1)(g), can be different for the same kind of institutions for similar kind of State action. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Bar Review [forthcoming] Excerpt: pp. 16 – 19. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:45 am
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, does the fact that there has been an alteration as referred to in Question 1 have any bearing on the answer to the question whether exhaustion within the terms of Article 4(2) of the Copyright Directive is hindered or interrupted? [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:08 pm by John Graubert and Laura Kim
  The current crisis does present some additional complications, however, because of its impact on the operations of the agency itself. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Joe Keiser
Since the COVID-19 pandemic caused increased disruption to customer service in March of 2020, the agency has yet to recover, like many other federal agencies. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:18 am by CharlesB
Social Security has insisted it would be more understanding and less strict with deadlines to complete paperwork during the COVID-19 pandemic because Social Security offices mostly remain closed to the public, but it does not mean that Social Security claimants should procrastinate in completing appeals on denied disability claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
(c) Thus one may conclude from the application as filed that claim 1 does not use the term “consists” as a closed term (im abschliessenden Sinne).To read the whole decision (T 523/08, in German), you may click here. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm by PaulKostro
The commission of a predicate act does not automatically require that a restraining order be issued. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
As a result, expanding survivor benefits does not provide an avenue for the federal government to revoke the State’s reverse offset status. [read post]