Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 1621 - 1640 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
  Unfortunately, the question of what steps an internet intermediary can be ordered to take to remove unlawful material from the internet gives rise to an even more complex set of questions and, again, there are inconsistencies anomalies as between defamation and Article 8 claims on the one hand and data protections claims on the other. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:36 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
This was devastating for The Perfect Puppy, Inc., a family owned pure-breed puppy store that had just opened a store (its second in the state) in the City. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:21 am
Metro, on the other hand, contends that the loss is not excluded and is covered by the Policy's Fraud and Alteration (`F&A’) endorsement.Metro Brokers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Electric Power Supply Association, and EnerNOC Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:54 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Reformation, on the other hand, may involve the addition of language not originally in the instrument, or the deletion of language originally included by mistake, if necessary to conform the instrument to the settlor’s intent. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
DB Structured Products, Inc., a closely-watched case that will have far-reaching implications for residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) repurchase litigation and potentially beyond. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
The hearing schedule and other details regarding attendance may be found at the TTAB website (lower right-hand corner)]. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:34 am
The Commission decided in favor of Baker, but on Monday, in Hands on Originals, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am by Andy Taylor
II“) both address the rule that applies when a parent who originally consents to a guardianship later seeks to terminate the guardianship. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am by Andy Taylor
II“) both address the rule that applies when a parent who originally consents to a guardianship later seeks to terminate the guardianship. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:00 pm
  No, it’s also our reaction to another preemption decision handed down almost simultaneously with Caplinger – by the Supreme Court – in Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]