Search for: "One Clothing Inc"
Results 1621 - 1631
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2006, 8:51 pm
Mattel Inc. recalled more than 4 million Polly Pocket play sets, dolls with small magnets in their hands, feet, clothing and other accessories. [read post]
Citable No. 51: TTAB Upholds 2(d) Refusal of "PSYCHO" for Clothing, But Overturns Mutilation Refusal
6 Dec 2006, 5:11 pm
In its 51st citable decision of 2006, the Board not surprisingly affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark PSYCHO for clothing, in light of the registered mark PSYCHO for clothing. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
One might say that Applicant Elizabeth A. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
Last week, the population in the virtual world of Second Life [1] reached one million. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:10 pm
You might want to shuffle on over to TTAB headquarters to hear one or more of the oral arguments scheduled for this month. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 2:52 am
Simon GmbH v OHIM, Anheuser-Busch, Inc, another case which, in the IPKat's opinion, should never have been allowed to waste the CFI's time.Anheuser-Busch applied to register as Community trade marks (CTMs) for beer (i) the word BUD and (ii) the two figurative signs that appear at the top of this post (for which registration in Classes 16 and 25 were also made, to cover paper and clothing). [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
See Knitwaves Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2006, 9:22 am
" From the post: "A Baltimore punk band, Oxes, claims the kitschy clothing chain owned by Gap Inc. ripped off one of its concert fliers to use on a T-shirt sold in Old Navy stores. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
In the 30th citable TTAB decision of 2006, the PTO succeeded in obtaining reconsideration and partial reversal of the Board's decision of September 26, 2005, in which the Board had reversed Section 2(a) disparagement refusals of the marks SQUAW and SQUAW ONE for clothing, ski equipment, and retail store services. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Brokers Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
See AMF Inc. v. [read post]
