Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 19,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
This bill does not legalize marijuana usage, it just reduces the penalty - marijuana is still illegal in California. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
The statement made clear that EU data protection law does not stand in the way of the adoption of measures to fight against the Coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
” 19 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Wilming in epi Information 1/2011, p. 31. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:08 am
Does CDC New Guidance Change the Answer? [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am
In a short but significant published opinion filed July 19, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the San Francisco County Superior Court’s judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of demurrers (without leave to amend) to a CEQA action as time-barred. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
Work that organizations could otherwise pay for that does not address those goals does not qualify. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
What Does an Employer Need to Do? [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
Reading this blog, replying to its posts, or any other interaction on this site does not create an attorney-client privilege between you and the author. [read post]
10 May 2020, 11:09 pm
What is the impact of IP on the Covid-19 crisis? [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
The individual does not have to be a notary public, and no separate agreement or contract between the employer and the agent is required. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. ___, No. 13-298, slip op. at 10 (June 19, 2014). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:19 pm
Her son is 19 and already in college. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 7:20 am
N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(1)(A) defines employment as “[a]ny service . . . performed for remuneration or under any contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” 19 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:01 am
The mark does not describe a "quality, feature, function, or characteristic" of the goods, and therefore it is not merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The statute does not require much by way of naming the expert. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 5:58 pm
The district court had invalidated claims 1-9 as ineligible and 10-19 as indefinite. [read post]
General Court rules that shape of Guerlain's Rouge G lipstick case can be registered as a trade mark
14 Jul 2021, 10:18 am
For instance: the Court of Justice of the European Union has held Birkenstock's surface pattern mark devoid of distinctiveness (C-26/17 P); LVMH has not yet been able to secure registration of its Damier Azur pattern (though things may look up now; T-105/19); the shape of Moon Boots may be protected by copyright (in Italy) but it has so far been unsuccessful on the trade mark registration front (1093/2019-1); and the Buffalo position mark has not been considered registrable… [read post]
