Search for: "Santa Clara County" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by Meyers Nave
County of Santa Clara, the California Supreme Court considered the question, if a notice of determination ("NOD") has been filed, but an action alleges that no environmental review was undertaken, which statute of limitations applies: (1) the general 30-day limit on challenges following a notice, or (2) the longer 180-day period provided for a case alleging that no environmental determination was made (§ 21167, subd. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
San Francisco County - (415) 553-1752 --------- Contact an experienced California Elder Abuse Attorney toll free at 1.866.999.9085 in the following California Counties: Alameda, Alpine, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacramento, San… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:14 pm by Steve Hall
  LINK This month marks the 25th anniversary of the murder of Jeanine Grinsell, who was killed by David Raley in Santa Clara County. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:05 am
Bar Panel Upholds Ex-Prosecutor's Suspension The Recorder A California State Bar Court appellate panel has upheld a four-year suspension for former Santa Clara County prosecutor Benjamin Field, despite an amicus curiae brief from the California District Attorneys Association warning of a chilling effect on prosecutions and stating that several of the bases for discipline involved unsettled law. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, et al. (2010) __ Cal.2d ___, the California Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal holding that the filing of a notice of determination (NOD) triggers a 30-day statute of limitations for all California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) challenges to the decision announced in the notice regardless of the nature of the CEQA violation.Factual Background   On December 12, 2000, the Santa… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:16 pm by Robert Ambrogi
Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm by Cal Law
The California Supreme Court today denied the Santa Clara-based company’s petition for review and stay, meaning trial will proceed in the suit filed by Jasmine Networks Inc. in Santa Clara County Superior Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm by admin
A major tributary of the Santa Clara River, Sespe Creek is a critical habitat for Southern California steelhead. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm by admin
A major tributary of the Santa Clara River, Sespe Creek is a critical habitat for Southern California steelhead. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Legal Talk Network
Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California, to explore what could have gone so terribly wrong. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Hyman from the Santa Clara County Superior Court in California, to explore what could have gone so terribly wrong. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:18 pm
MercuryNews.com of San Jose, CA recently reported that three executives and a foreman of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning installation company in Hollister, CA are facing felony charges of forcing employees to return more than $170,000 in salary from public projects in Santa Clara County. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:18 pm by Michael O'Connor & Associates, LLC
MercuryNews.com of San Jose, CA recently reported that three executives and a foreman of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning installation company in Hollister, CA are facing felony charges of forcing employees to return more than $170,000 in salary from public projects in Santa Clara County. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:37 am by John Steele
The Santa Clara County DA has initiated an office-wide "boycott" of a judge who has made adverse rulings, including findings that a prosecutor had lied about evidence that had not been produced in discovery. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 28 (1888) (corporation entitled to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments); Santa Clara County v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:42 pm
Bellotti, which relies on Santa Clara County in footnote 15. [read post]