Search for: "21st Judicial Court Judges" Results 161 - 180 of 630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 2:24 pm by Amy Howe
That led the TABC to go to court, where it asked a federal judge to rule on whether Tennessee’s residency requirement is constitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:41 am
But even there plenty of evidence can be found that those who ratified the Amendment wanted the States to be able to regulate the sale of liquor free of judicial meddling under the dormant Commerce Clause—and there is no evidence they wanted judges to have the power to decide that state laws restricted competition “too much. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm by NBlack
Gokhan Orun d/b/a/ WhoNear) and a New York family court judge (Noel B. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 4:22 pm by NBlack
Gokhan Orun d/b/a/ WhoNear) and a New York family court judge (Noel B. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
For instance, a 1930s High Court judge named Douglas Young put up considerable resistance to a distinctively colonial provision of criminal procedure that endangered defendants' right to a fair trial. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:30 pm
’ Echoing these sentiments, an eminent Chinese jurist has urged judges to ‘absolutely’ not embrace ‘false’ Western concepts such as judicial independence, separation of powers and constitutionalism. [read post]
Lawyers and judges roll their eyes and shrug their shoulders at public complaints of sharp practice (“they don’t understand our adversarial system”), unclear decision-making (“they don’t understand judicial discretion”), consumer-unfriendly billing conventions, and an overall lack of accountability. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
The 214th edition of Never Too Late takes a look at what the Kats have been blogging about between the 21st to 27th of January! [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am by Beth Graham
Hoffmann-La Roche confines district courts’ notice-sending authority to notifying potential plaintiffs; it directs judges “to avoid even the appearance of judicial endorsement of the merits of the action”; and it nowhere suggests that employees have a right to receive notice of potential FLSA claims. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am by Derek Muller
But the Supreme Court hears these cases on direct appeal from three-judge panels. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal (registration or subscription required) writes that “Justice Samuel Alito Jr., perhaps the Supreme Court’s most reliable conservative, and the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, one of the court’s liberal lions, would seem to be polar opposites as judges. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, Jan. 7 at 2:00 p.m.: The Brookings Institution will host a panel discussion on the politics of the New START Treaty and strategic modernization. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Florian Mueller
There is, however, a potential risk: the federal courts will run out of funding on January 11, so unless the government shutdown ends or some bridge funding is arranged, there is a risk (though Judge Lucy H. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Her extremist stance left her weakened on the court as a result, with her core GAW-faction members abandoning her over the conflict and centrists on the court tag teaming to discredit her positions.As a frequent critic of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, I must say, I'm proud of them all, especially Judge Hervey. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Bloomberg, Noah Feldman weighs in on the recent dismissal of judicial misconduct charges against Justice Brett Kavanaugh, suggesting that the Constitution may not bar Congress from “impos[ing] conditions on the justices’ conduct” and arguing that “making the Supreme Court justices answer to the same codes of judicial conduct that govern other federal judges won’t meaningfully compromise their independence. [read post]