Search for: "Brake Parts, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2016, 11:10 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
 Although this presumption can be a useful tool for litigants, the presumption is not absolute, and those seeking to make recourse to this presumption must be able to show that no possible negligence on their part contributed to the collision. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 12:40 pm by David Kopel
The case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On appeal, the Ford Motor Company argued, in part, that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of design changes in the Ford truck’s brake system, claiming that the designed changes were in admissible as subsequent remedial measures. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:41 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Humanscale Corporation and the Respondents are CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Corporation Ltd. d/b/a CompX Waterloo. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The plaintiff’s complaint unsurprisingly had to name nearly two dozen defendants, from General Motors, to Daimler Chrysler, to Ford, to Napa Auto Parts, to Pneumo Abex, successor of American Brake Shoe and Foundry, founded 1902. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am by Dennis Crouch
Boyden Power Brake Co., 170 U.S. 537, 568 (1898). [3] Id. at 568 (internal citations omitted). [4] Id. at 572. [5] Id. at 568 (emphasis added) (internal citations omitted). [6] Graver Tank & Mfg. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm by Brian Frye
Sam Ernst wrote about Boyden Power Brake Co. v. [read post]