Search for: "CAPITAL BANK, N.A." Results 161 - 180 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 7:06 am by Lori J. Sommerfield
Capital One, N.A., which urged the court to reverse a district court ruling that an individual who had already received credit from the defendant and who was not currently applying to the defendant for credit was not an “applicant” for purposes of the ECOA’s adverse action notice requirement. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank of America, N.A. subsequently acquired Countrywide Bank, N.A. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
., Carlyle Investment Management, Blackstone Capital Partners V, Centerbridge Capital Partners, LeFrak Organization, Inc., The Wellcome Trust, Greenaap Investments, and the East Rock Endowment Fund. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:42 pm by Randall Reese
"Today, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its role as trustee under the senior indenture governing the first tier and second tier tax-exempt bonds, joined in Ambac's motion. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:59 pm by admin
Torres and his co-conspirators directed their fraudulent activities at Corus Bank, N.A., and a variety of FDIC-insured and non-FDIC insured mortgage lending businesses (the “mortgage lenders”) for purposes of influencing them to approve millions of dollars in mortgage loans. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm by Wolfgang Demino
According to the reasoning in Simien, the bank’s operating environment would discourage noncompliance with applicable law, and would create incentives for accuracy in record-keeping, lest the bank run into problems with regulators and its business suffer gravely.[9]But the reasonableness of such reliance by the testifying witness’s organization cannot said to have been established in a case where the affiant does not even identify by name the entity whose records are to… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:46 pm
  The lower courts dismissed the claims against Scientific-Atlanta and Motorola, holding that the Supreme Court’s prior decision in Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
TOPCIS: federal-preemption, MIDLAND-FUNDING-LLC, National-Bank-Act, predatory-lending-issue, usury – posted 12/12/17Rich Reister vs. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Harbir Deol
It is expected that this limitation will become irrelevant once the pending reforms to capital markets are implemented. [read post]