Search for: "D. W."
Results 161 - 180
of 14,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
[W]e hold the district court committed legal error by understating the woman's interest in anonymity, appearing to announce a general rule that fairness considerations invariably cut against allowing a plaintiff to be anonymous at trial unless the defendant is also anonymous, and failing to recognize the significance of its default judgment on liability…. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:13 am
In re LIT Hookah LLC, Serial No. 87904603 (February 14, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
As Professor Mark W. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Werner, Sisyphus in robes: International law, legal interpretation and the absurd Nina Reiners, States as bystanders of legal change: Alternative paths for the human rights to water and sanitation in international law Eliana Cusato & Emily Jones, The ‘imbroglio’ of ecocide: A political economic analysis International Law and Practice Louis Bélanger & Jean-Frédéric Morin, Treaty amendment procedures: A typology from a survey of multilateral… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Given that the indictment “conclusively determine[d] the existence of probable cause,” the judge “should have issued the warrant as a matter of course. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The issue was whether sections 19(2)(b), (c) and (d) applied. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
We already make this kind of distinction in other contexts, for example, someone who has a valid mark can oppose registrations on 2(d) confusion grounds, but if you don’t have a mark but do have fame that you aren’t using as a mark in commerce on goods or services, you can oppose using 2(a), which bars registration of trademarks that "falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead” or with institutions. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
Hidden in ordinary case b/c the use complained of is the D’s use to create the D’s work. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The former president had not forgotten how Brandeis had humiliated him and his attorney general, George W. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
I’d like to think that at best, this prosecutor was extremely naive, a rube perhaps. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
A version of this article was previously published in the D&O Notebook. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
The parties agreed to not use the term “oligarch” in the proceedings.[29] From the 38 works Rybolovlev bought through Bouvier, 12 were arranged with assistance from Sotheby’s to Bouvier, and only four of those were at issue in trial.[30] These four include Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvador Mundi, Modigliani’s Tete, Klimt’s Wasserschlangen II, and Magritte’s Domaine d’Arnheim. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Moreover, even if Colorado’s intent were to try to impose a condition on Trump’s service, obviously that condition would be that he not be Section-3-disqualified to serve on January 20, 2025, rather than that (as Mitchell would have it) that he’d be disqualified from taking office as of March 5, 2024 (the date of the Colorado primary). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:57 pm
Catherine D. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He also “hate[d] to use patronage as a club unless I have to. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
In den heutigen «Datenschutz Plaudereien» freue ich mich, einmal mehr David Rosenthal als Spezialgast begrüssen zu dürfen. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:29 am
Bitte sprechen Sie uns gerne an, wenn wir Sie zu einem der genannten Themen beraten dürfen. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 2:33 am
“[W]hen a frustrated litigant complained of counsel’s omissions,’[p]laintiff’s remedy relies on prima facie proof that she would have succeeded’[.] [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
“[W]hether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:18 am
“[W]hen a consumer must type in a thirty-seven-character URL to their cellphone or computer, it is more difficult to navigate to the terms of use in order to confirm” just what she has been asked to agree to. [read post]
