Search for: "DONALD DUCK" Results 161 - 180 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2016, 5:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
There are nominations pending for some of these vacancies, but the likelihood of any lame-duck Senate action on the pending nominations seems remote. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It is ironic that Donald Trump's position against the TPP was largely premised on the assumption that it would benefit China. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:59 am by Graham Webster
Second, the Trans-Pacific Partnership is dead unless a Congress led by defiant Republicans ratifies the treaty in the lame duck session. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:36 am by Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon
In case you have not heard, in what can only be called one of the biggest upsets in U.S. presidential election history, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton this morning and is now the President-Elect of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:36 am by Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon
In case you have not heard, in what can only be called one of the biggest upsets in U.S. presidential election history, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton this morning and is now the President-Elect of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:41 am by Daniel Schwartz
 Will a lame-duck Congress try to block those rules from being implemented? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
" Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump plans to sue all of the "liars" who have accused him of sexual assault within the last two weeks when the election is over. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At the Washington Examiner, Susan Crabtree reports that “Earnest said President Obama would welcome Garland’s Senate confirmation during the lame-duck session. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:58 am by David Lat
[Corporate Counsel] * Kasowitz Benson's recent legal work on behalf of Donald Trump is just the latest example of the firm representing litigious tycoons. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the “Supreme Court finally got a moment from the presidential candidates” during Sunday night’s debate, “with Hillary Clinton saying she would appoint justices who would lead the court in a different ‘direction,’ and Donald Trump saying his nominees would be in the mold of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:37 am by Stephen Wermiel
Of course, if Donald Trump wins on November 8, there is no incentive for Republicans to act on the Garland nomination. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Should Hillary Clinton be elected president in November, the Senate might confirm Garland during the lame-duck session before year’s end. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 6:53 pm
He had ducked Tapper’s question about the entire 11 million.... [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:16 am by Edward A. Fallone
  The alternative is to risk everything on the hope that either Donald Trump will win the election or that Hillary Clinton will re-nominate Judge Garland in a spirit of good will. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:29 am
I could go all sociology on you and expound about this is a trillion dollar monument to man's need to be amused, but....wait, Donald Duck just went by! [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Since I’ve been known to be a betting man, I will tell you right now that I doubt seriously whether Hesse will ever see a confirmation hearing in the lame duck term of President Obama. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 5:57 am by Staci Zaretsky
" If Donald Trump continues to return unimpressive poll results, some say that Supreme Court nominee Chief Justice Merrick Garland could receive a hearing after all. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm by Simon Lester
 Donald Trump is, too, meaning that the next President is opposed to this deal. [read post]