Search for: "Decisions Child Care Center, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Joshua Matz
”   Doug Kendall echoes this sentiment at the Huffington Post, where he contends that “this claim is wrong, but if it were to succeed, it would be a constitutional earthquake that would throw into question Medicaid and other federal statutes that create federal/state partnerships to solve nationwide problems such as health care, child welfare and discrimination. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
After being relisted a mere two times – oh Marmet, we hardly knew ye – Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Louis’s zoning laws governing public signs, and the West Virginia double-header Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The book titled - The ABCs of Child Injury - Legal Rights of the Injured Child - What Every Parent Should Know has chapters on Swimming and Water Park Injuries, Automobile Accidents, School Injuries, Day Care Center Injuries, Damages / Compensation, Medical Treatment / Medical Care, and other topics. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 2:17 pm by admin
  “The town,” asks the careful reader. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply   Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
  Conduit for Inadmissible Evidence Much academic, judicial, and professional criticism of Rule 703, before its amendment in 2000, centered on the mischief created by expert witnesses’ reliance upon inadmissible evidence and the disclosure of this information to the jury. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionPetitioners' reply (forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence et al. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The estate of Deborah Parks claims that Mid America Care Center LLC and Glenwood Healthcare & Rehab Inc. both neglected to properly assess her condition and treat the cancerous tumor in her rectum. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus, the Toner decision consistently seems to go out of its way to make the comment k defense as costly and time consuming as possible.As for negligence, while the Toner court held that comment k did not “literally” apply (it being a comment to strict liability), the same general principles were the same in negligence law:In a general sense, however, the comment k concerns and its required balancing between risks and benefits are similar to those involved in a negligence… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Before her death, the plaintiff’s mother’s medical care was paid for by Medicare, a federal program administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). [read post]