Search for: "Division of Administrative Law Appeals" Results 161 - 180 of 4,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 3:03 am
Malitz then filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights [NYSDHR] contending that he had been unlawfully terminated from his position due to his sleep apnea disability in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Section 296, Executive Law]. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Commissioner’s decision, explaining that “The standard of review of an administrative determination ‘made as a result of a hearing held, and at which evidence was taken, pursuant to direction by law’ is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullen & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Crim 606 (01 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Adams v The Law Society of England and Wales & Ors [2012] EWHC 980 (QB) (17 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) The Manydown Company Ltd. v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) (17 April 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court dismissed her amended complaint, ruling that Mehulic's retaliation claim under Labor Law §741 "is completely barred by [the doctrine of] collateral estoppel".* The Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's ruling explaining that with respect to the earlier administrative determinations "there was no express or implied ruling that [Hospital], in terminating Mehulic, "had impermissibly retaliated against her… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
When an administrative appeal of the denial was unsuccessful, Maiolini retained the law firm of McAdams & Fallon (MF) to file another appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Thus, explained the court, exhaustion of administrative remedies provided by a collective bargaining agreement is not necessary "where, as here, the [Principal] alleges violations of the Education Law, not violations of the agreement. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:05 am by John Jascob
By Suzanne CosgroveA state appeals court has affirmed a decision by the Iowa Insurance Division that two salesmen from Texas company Carson Energy, Inc., violated the state’s blue-sky laws. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this appeal challenging an adverse disciplinary decision following an administrative hearing on the various allegations of misconduct and insubordination filed against the Petitioner pursuant to Civil Service Law §75, the Appellate Division found that the misconduct findings by the hearing officer were supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this appeal challenging an adverse disciplinary decision following an administrative hearing on the various allegations of misconduct and insubordination filed against the Petitioner pursuant to Civil Service Law §75, the Appellate Division found that the misconduct findings by the hearing officer were supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:20 am by John Jascob
Nelson, J.D.An SEC administrative law judge has dismissed the Enforcement Division’s in-house case against Lynn Tilton. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Lui earned a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of California, Los Angeles Graduate School of Business Administration, a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law and a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California, Los Angeles. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:53 am by Donald Barbati
The Appellate Division affirmed the Civil Service Commission’s determination for substantially the same reasons stated by the Administrative Law Judge, thereby upholding the appellant’s removal from employment. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:11 pm
A decision can be correct (or at least unchallenged) in an administrative law sense, but nonetheless give rise to damages in private law. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An individual or organization must have “standing” in order to maintain an Article 78 action challenging an administrative decisionThomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 02154, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMichael P. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 7:54 pm by alexkorotkin
 Because of the apparent conflict between the departments, this issue is also likely to be appealed to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:51 am by Nathaniel F. Hansford, LLC
Additionally, the Court of Appeals of Georgia, Third Division, ruled that it did not need to address the employee’s claims regarding the administrative law judge’s evidentiary findings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 12:17 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Last June, the Administrative Committee of the UPC unanimously decided to set up a section of the central division of the UPC in Milan. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”In the words of the Appellate Division, “this delay of nearly a generation has plumbed a new depth of administrative inertia that has, in our view, reached the point of being ‘jurisprudentially intolerable. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
* The Appellate Division, in considering a procedural defense, noted that “Under the facts of this case, a notice of claim pursuant to Education Law §3813(1) was not required. [read post]