Search for: "Doe, et al v. Doe, et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 8,752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:27 am
The case, Ugochukwu Goodluck Nwauzor, et al v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:41 am
Patent No. 6,624,245 to Wallace et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:13 pm
Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., No. 22-7163 (Dec. 19, 2023) (“D.C. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:30 am
The absence of a finding that Ressemann does not have a coaxial lumen cannot establish the fact that the reference has those features. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
“In November 2022, plaintiff Holland & Knight LLC commenced the instant actionagainst defendant Walsam 316, LLC to recover outstanding legal fees Walsam accrued as part of plaintiffs legal representation in an underlying case entitled Walsam 316 LLC et al v 316 Bowery Realty Corp. et al. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055, and other Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner explained "a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1(b) is fatally defective and must be denied. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Application of Johnson, et al., 56 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,055, and other Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner explained "a removal application that does not include the specific notice required by 8 NYCRR 277.1(b) is fatally defective and must be denied. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, Barry et al.(1990); Hochberg (2012), Celikyurt et al. (2014), and Iliev and Lowry (2020) show that venture capitalists maintain board influence well beyond a firm’s IPO. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
(That action, Peter Arnold et al. v 4-6 Bleecker Street LLC et al., has the NYSCEF Index no. 158541/2013.) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Corwin, et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Stability AI Ltd. et al, 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am
Karnis et. al. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:07 am
Lambert et al., the young man was driving home from dinner when he struck a motorcyclist, who is the plaintiff in this case. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
A firm implementing its own AI system does not guarantee victory. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:50 am
The case is entitled Barnett et al. v. [read post]
