Search for: "Doe Corporations 1-5" Results 161 - 180 of 8,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 8:52 am by Jon Gelman
"Appellate Division ordered the trial judge to include the following restrictions:"(1) the type of record requested; (2) the information it does or might contain; (3) the potential for harm in any subsequent nonconsensual disclosure; (4) the injury from disclosure to the relationship in which the record was generated; (5) the adequacy of safeguards to prevent unauthorized disclosure; (6) the degree of need for access; and (7) whether there is an express statutory… [read post]
The Directive does not apply to downstream business partners that receive services and products. 5. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
Does your company use a Rule 10b5-1 plan for corporate buybacks: - Yes - 58.1% - No - 41.9% 2. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
When a corporation does it, it’s called charity. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm by Samantha M. Cira
The final rule does allow the Secretary of Treasury the authority to expand the exemptions. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 8:20 am by Renae Lloyd
Fortunately, FINRA does provide for an arbitration forum for investors to resolve such disputes. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:47 am by Michael Smith
The twelve factors are (1) common ownership (presumably relevant when multiple entities are involved); (2) pervasive control (which is not enough, by itself, to pierce the veil); (3) confused intermingling of business assets; (4) thin capitalization; (5) nonobservance of corporate formalities; (6) absence of corporate records; (7) no payment of dividends; (8) insolvency at the time of the litigated transaction; (9) siphoning away of corporation’s… [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:00 am by Holly Brezee
By: Michael Lehr  [5/27/22] Part 1 As of January 2021, nearly 40 years since the first iteration of a communications protocol capable of transferring and linking various computer networks to one another, there are over 4.5 active internet users. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:03 am by Shafik Bhalloo
Section 96(1) states:   Corporate officer’s liability for unpaid wages 96 (1) A person who was a director or officer of a corporation at the time wages of an employee of the corporation were earned or should have been paid is personally liable for up to 2 months’ unpaid wages for each employee. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:03 am by Shafik Bhalloo
Section 96(1) states:   Corporate officer’s liability for unpaid wages 96 (1) A person who was a director or officer of a corporation at the time wages of an employee of the corporation were earned or should have been paid is personally liable for up to 2 months’ unpaid wages for each employee. [read post]