Search for: "Doe Corporations I-X"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
If method X, for example, can operate by killing a fertilized egg or embryo, then a person who believes that life begins at conception would consider method X to be an abortifacient. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:57 am
Cowgill states the following in his post: Over the past 25 years I've worked in law firms, a corporate law department and a state bar association, all of which used PC systems. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Yet one does not see a slew of lawsuits against big-firm corporate lawyers for breaching their fiduciary duty to shareholders of the corporation that they serve. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
A lot of personal-jurisdiction questions come down to corporations arguing that they didn’t know (or couldn’t reasonably expect) that Product X it makes in State X would end up in State Y or that the connection between Product X and State Y is too tenuous to make a legitimate argument that it should be on notice of potential lawsuits. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
In other words, does proof of dilution by blurring still hinge on proving that the marks are substantially similar or nearly identical? [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:53 am
It DOES NOT address General Obligations Law 5-1703 disclosures which must be made by the factoring company when submitting the matter for statutory Court approval of a structured settlement factoring transactions. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
(So, to be clear, it does not apply retrospectively, as when I tell you about a crime I have already committed.) [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
I have to ask though, does reality reflect the talk. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
They could jeopardize federal programs like Medicaid and Title X that provide family-planning services to millions of women. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Many remarkable legal documents land in my inbox, and I try to mention as many as I can. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
What happens to the file, how does it get transferred and who pays for the transfer? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm
Although self-spreading, NotPetya does not generally spread outside of a single corporate network: it pretty much only bridges networks when computers move between them. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:37 am
I’m not even sure that any but the largest and most sophisticated corporate entities could do so. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm
I plan to celebrate by sending my tech savvy, Generation X son a copy of the Prater decision as proof of our constitutional need for parchment, at least when certain inalienable rights are concerned. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 5:01 am
I really wonder whether the test measures cognitive response more than it does implicit bias. [read post]
24 May 2019, 10:56 am
On the legal front, this week was the worst ever for Qualcomm in its corporate history, due to the FTC's sweeping victory in the Northern District of California on Tuesday shortly before midnight Pacific Time. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 am
Nor is the right to free speech implicated by the actions of social media platforms that choose to block users for their speech, a private corporation’s decision to withhold business from X, or a private university’s decision to expel students for their speech. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:58 pm
That some things are hard, however, does not make them any less true. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
I don’t think the “We haven’t had rain like this in X number of years” defense against foreseeability holds up. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
Cooper and Sons, does not list Nike as a brand that it offers. [read post]
