Search for: "Does 1 - 39"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 7:04 am
Jeffrey puts that number into perspective by pointing out that the number of people taking SSDIB exceeds the population of 39 states. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:56 am
There, the U.S. cited SPS Agreement Articles 2.2, 5, 8 and Annex C(1); GATT Articles X:1 and XI:1; Agriculture Agreement Article 4.2; and TBT Agreement Article 2 (without mentioning which sub-provisions). [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:56 pm
It does me no good to set a client's expectations that costs will be low and then go way over budget. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:35 am
Their Amendment does not change the bill's fundamental problems. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:42 pm
Only if he deems it a second motion under (d)(1) does he have discretion to rule on whether they are true or not. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:17 pm
One is the Reid-Feingold plan, which would begin a withdrawal of troops in 120 days and end all combat operations on April 1. . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:30 am
Defense counsel: No objections, your honor.J: The court will admit State's Exhibit Number 1 into evidence.That's it. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:31 am
This notice is effective 1/18/10 and shall be without effect at the end of one year after 1/18/10. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:05 am
If he's happy and rich, does it really matter what his qualifications are? [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:37 am
That was denied too: From the court's Docket on PACER: 05/16/2012 ORAL ORDER denying 283 Motion as to JOHNNY REID EDWARDS (1); denying 284 Motion as to JOHNNY REID EDWARDS (1) for reasons stated from bench by JUDGE CATHERINE C. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
Although this does NOT mean you should avoid rendering calls-to-action as graphics as well. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 8:42 pm
Does anyone disagree with this? [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:08 pm
What does Jim Wallis, who is anti-choice, think of this? [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:28 am
Operator #1: OK, we don't need you to do that. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:12 pm
Let's play out the scenarios: (1) The bill is passed. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:49 am
Does anyone know of a more methodologically sound study of Roberts's voting record? [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
," Australian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 39 (2021) [preprint]"Exit Rights, Seamless Borders and the New Nation-State Container," International Migration (Forthcoming) [preprint]"International Refugee Law in Crisis: Islands, Incarceration and Neo-Refoulment During COVID-19 Crisis," Australian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 39 (2021) [preprint]"Migrant vulnerability or asylum seeker/refugee vulnerability? [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:00 pm
Superior Court (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 39 (holding that an individual's assignment of a cause of action to a third party does not carry with it the individual's statutory right to sue in a representative capacity under PAGA or the Unfair Competition Law at Business and Professions Code § 17203). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
The police detective and the fire chief who handled the case both now say that the refrigerator's location does not support the theory that the fire was arson. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 4:40 am
Does FERC have jurisdiction? [read post]
