Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2010, 7:16 am
Generally 29 CFR 2510.3-1 provides that the definition of "employee welfare benefit plans" in Section 3(1) of ERISA does not include arrangements that pay an employee's normal compensation, out of the employer's general assets, on account of periods of time during which the employee is physically or mentally unable to perform his or her duties, or is otherwise absent for medical reasons. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:09 am
As regards the shocking feature of this reference, this is that this time the CJEU had to answer just one (1!) [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:25 am
J.A.96–97. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 11:01 am
As [the amendment] only corresponds to a syntactical redrafting of the claims, which does not lead to any substantial modification, there is, according to the established case law of the Boards of appeal, no reason to [raise] any new objection beyond A 100 EPC 1973 (see, for instance, T 367/96 [6.2], T 381/02 [2.3.7], T 1855/07 [2.2-4]). [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
[8] See id. at 389-90, 395-96; see also id. at 395-96 (analogizing the Court to the Pope, whose Biblical interpretations Catholics treat as definitive); LEVINSON, supra note 1, at 9-53 (emphasizing that the Constitution and a sacred text are both written, permanent, and viewed as binding authority) [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:17 am
Burger King announced April 1 that it is testing the “Impossible Whopper” in certain markets. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
This rule does not address this authority. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that § 53a-151 (a) does not proscribe attempts to prevent an individual from speaking to the police because the statute requires the intent to affect a witness' conduct at an official proceeding. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:24 pm
But Florida DOES NOT recognize Common Law Marriage!!! [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 22 referred to method claims 1 to 19 in a “short format” which was regarded to be clear in the decision T 410/96 of the boards of appeal. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:35 am
He seems to suggest that the test covers sections 98(1)-(3) of the ERA 96, but does not go far enough in asking whether the reason is a sufficient reason for dismissing the employee to satisfy section 98(4) of the ERA 96. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:26 pm
But the revised law does not say that exactly. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:00 am
Impairment rating for injuries after 10/1/00 are as follows: 0-5% $ 75,000 6-10% 80,000 11-15% 85,000 16-20% 90,000 21-25% 95,000 26-30% 100,000 31-35% 110,000 36-40% 120,000 41-45% 130,000 46-50% 140,000 51-55% 165,000 56-60% 190,000 61-65% 215,000 66-70% 240,000 71-75% 265,000 76-80% 315,000 81-85% 365,000 86-90% 415,000 91-95% 465,000 96-100% 515,000 Now,… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
1. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
So how often does a Chapter 7 bankruptcy get filed in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona? [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
" No. 96-583, 1997 U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
How does the statue of limitations and its exceptions apply? [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:05 am
Does this apply to you? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Volvo Cars of N. [read post]
