Search for: "Exelis, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 5,909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 9:52 am
The case in question, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:00 am
The case in question, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
In my last blog, I wrote about the shortcomings of compensating displaced property owners based on the ‘objective’ standard of the market value of their property. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
" Metabolife Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
The Supreme Court in Hansen , quoting Illinois ex rel. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:11 am
The ex-broker also allegedly falsified papers when questions were raised about the account receiving the checks, which had the broker’s home address. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
Executive Health Resources Inc. et al., No. 21-1052, 2023 WL 4034314 (U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
Executive Health Resources Inc. et al, No. 21-1052, 2023 WL 4034314 (U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:21 am
Executive Health Resources, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
Tecsys inc. c. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
Yankee Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
Here are three recent likelihood of confusion cases: one opposition and two ex parte appeals. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:04 pm
SuperValu Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Here are three recent decisions under the mere descriptiveness prong of Section 2(e)(1): one opposition and two ex parte appeals. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:44 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
Safeway, Inc., No. 11-3406, at *4 (C.D. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:05 pm
The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept. 2015) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm
Contempt petition ruling In response to Gandhi-Kapoor’s petition for a contempt ruling, the Vice Chancellor decided that, “Advancement provides corporate officials with immediate interim relief from the personal out-of-pocket financial burden of paying the significant on-going expenses inevitably involved with investigations and legal proceedings,” citing Homestore, Inc. v. [read post]