Search for: "Exxon Mobile Corp" Results 161 - 180 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by ADR Times
A possible Norwegian strike by offshore workers at KCA Deutag Drilling Ltd. was pushed back by a month after a deadline for mediation was set for Sept. 1. ndustry Energy, a labor union, had said July 13 that 159 KCA employees at Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
Marcia Coyle reports in The National Law Journal that Exxon Mobil Corp has recently filed a cert petition in the Supreme Court, pertaining to the "complex legal fallout" from the Exxon Valdez oil spill off the Alaskan coast. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:31 am by Daniel Shaviro
Examples would include the tax-free merger of companies like Exxon and Mobil into Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:57 pm
From WSJ: "The Supreme Court Monday extended its examination of punitive damages against corporations by taking up a $2.5 billion award against Exxon Mobil Corp. over the 1989 Valdez oil spill in Alaska. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Bridget Lee
The companies from which shareholders are seeking reports include Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., Chesapeake Energy, Exxon Mobil Corp., Hess Corp., El Paso Corp., Energen Corp., EOG Resources, EQT Corp., Range Resources, Ultra Petroleum Corp., Williams Companies Inc., and XTO Energy Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
***Of the Exxon case-->In Johnson & Johnston: Disclosed, Never Claimed, Public Domain, (IPT, p. 44 (May 2002)), LBE wroteOn April 11, [2002] the Associated Press reported that the federalgovernment has admitted infringing an Exxon Mobil Corp. petroleum patent and agreed to pay the oil company $ 2,583. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
The Supreme Court recently revisited the doctrine in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm by Danny Jacobs
Court of Special Appeals asked to vacate opinion on Exxon Mobil damages — by Danny Jacobs The Court of Special Appeals should vacate its decision striking down a significant portion of the $150 million in damages awarded to 88 Jacksonville households from Exxon Mobil Corp., according to a motion filed by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA4th 1315 is an example of the court’s misunderstanding of the Discovery Act and reacting erroneously to a garbage discovery response. [read post]